Episodes 2022; 45(1): 53-54
Published online March 1, 2022
https://doi.org/10.18814/epiiugs/2021/021004
Copyright © International Union of Geological Sciences.
by Peter D. Kruse*
South Australian Museum, PO Box 825, Normanville SA 5204, Australia
Correspondence to:E-mail: archaeo.kruse@gmail.com
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
A recently proposed subsystem scale seeks to overlay a threefold subsystem scheme onto the four-series Cambrian. It does this by uniting the two lowest global series within a single subsystem, whereas the remaining two subsystems coincide with the global Miaolingian and Furongian series. This is an impractical scheme, strongly influenced by historical precedent, and an alternative scheme of two subsystems, each comprising two global series, is here proposed.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |